Thursday, September 09, 2010
   
Text Size

Local News

Unions Are Un-American

Political Analysis

Have you heard of the GEP? Were you aware we have a three-party system? Are 
you familiar with which one has the most money?
We have the Republicans, affectionately called the GOP (Grand Old Party);
the Democrats, with no affectionate nickname; and the GEP, the Government
Employees Party. The GEP is the union's party. GEP membership is made up of
voters who aren't allowed to either think for themselves or support the
candidates of their choice. The GEP Party is wrecking America.
Take for instance state employees. How do you think PERS (Public Employees
Retirement System) is going to pay back the money they robbed from their own
union members' pensions in order to give hundreds of millions of dollars to
the campaigns of the elected officials and the potentially elected
officials they bought to put in their pocket in order to secure their union
contracts?
Let's look at the history of unions. Back in time unions had great
intentions. A lot of our industrial workers labored under very unsafe conditions,
earning low wages and having no legal protection. Unions were successful in
bringing about many improvements for some of the work force. They've served
some industries, and brought regulations, so the employees wouldn't be
exploited. However, now the unions exploit job-creating employers to such an
extreme that it is destroying our economy. Let's be crystal clear about who pays
the unions; we the taxpayers and the private sector, that's who. Union
workers, here's what you aren't being told: the private sector is facing record
high jobless numbers and yet is footing the bill for unsustainable union
pensions.
In 2010 the private sector has three million fewer workers; the public
sector has grown by two million more government jobs. The average salary of a
mid- to upper-level government employee is $123,000.00; the average salary in
our private sector is $61,000.00. In 2005 we had 118 million private sector
jobs, now we only have 105 million, and the 105 million are taxed to pay for
government workers. The difference in pay is about $61,000.00 a year.
That's 600 billion a year which is taxed to the private sector just to pay the
difference in compensation to the public sector. Hmm, how long do you think we
can afford to carry these unions? The corporations are paying 40 percent
just to support this monster.
Are you okay with your children and grandchildren living on the streets and
in poverty? because that's where we are heading. WAKE UP AMERICA! STOP and
CUT SPENDING. Our Federal Government has increased its GDP (gross domestic
product) from 19.6 percent in 2007 to 25 percent today with an increase of
2.5 percent a year because of the greed and the self-serving economic policies
of the union leadership.
Bush had unemployment down to 4.5 percent and now Obama has it at 10
percent nationally. Are you feeling the impact, or at least understanding it? Our
pro-union big government just keeps adding employees. They're about to put
16,000 new IRS agents on the books so they can rob more Americans of their
hard earned unsecured dollar; and hey, if you don't like it, then you can go
straight to jail. How many government employees do you think our government
has in mind to hire for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act? Not
to mention the FINREGs (financial regulations) have 20 to 30 new agencies.
The Fed will keep adding. The states will have to make hard decisions and cuts
in services. We, at the state, county, and city level will have to budget
away services to pay for the GEP. The cuts will come to education, first
responders such as police, and even our very own overpaid union fire fighters.
There is nothing left to tax. Take General Motors as an example; another
bailout on tax payer dollars. The UAW, United Auto Workers union, wound up
getting their work force laid off because they paid unnecessarily high wages and
benefits that they couldn't sustain. It's the same with the government
unions with their outrageous pay and benefit demands that we tax payers pay for.
Soon they, too, will be looking at massive layoffs. There's already talk
about increasing furlough days for state employees and considering state
employee layoffs.
These unions get the politicians elected and the politicians make sure the
unions get funded by our tax dollar. This is not okay.
Some government employees continue getting raises whether the country's
falling apart or not - just so long as the taxes keep coming in. Higher pay for
government employees can only come through higher taxes on private sector
workers. The latest example comes from Oregon, where public sector unions
outspent businesses 3 to 2 to pass two ballot initiatives raising taxes by $700
million. The unions wanted higher taxes to prevent spending cuts. Had the
tax increases failed, government employees in Oregon would have faced
cost-cutting measures such as contributing toward the cost of their health benefits
- something they currently do not do.
Government employees have done well in this recession. Few government jobs
have disappeared - unlike in the private sector - and their pay rose at
twice the rate of their private sector counterparts. No wonder that government
employees are almost three times as likely as private sector workers to
believe that the economy is in good or excellent shape. The question for policy
makers is why should private sector workers have to pay for this?
There is really no difference between LA gangs robbing entrepreneurs and
small business owners for protection money in order to stay in business and
the unions forcing us to pay them for what we're already doing. Unions are
thoughtless automatons, kind of like bottom feeders that can only make a living
by robbing the private sector. What the unions are not seeing is that our
government doesn't create wealth; the private sector does. So what are they
going to do once they bankrupt us? How will they support their appetite for
more, when the private sector is all taxed-out?
Unions killed the auto industry; unions killed the manufacturing industry;
and unions are about to kill the American private sector. Conspiracy? Nope,
just an executed plan to force the North American Union on us so we will
have Mexico, Canada and the United States as a Union in order to have a single
market through a standardized system of laws which would apply to all three
countries to ensure the free movement of people, goods, services, and
capital, including the elimination of the use of our passports in and out of
Mexico and Canada.
Union Bosses are generally the type to enforce “do as I say not as I do.”
The United Federation of Teachers just fired one of its longtime employees
for trying to unionize the dominant labor organization's own workers. Jim
Callaghan, 63, from Staten Island, New York; a veteran writer for the teachers
union lost his cushy $100,000-a-year job just two months after he told UFT
President Michael Mulgrew that he was trying to unionize some of his
co-workers. “I was fired for trying to start a union at the UFT,” said a
dumbfounded Callaghan, who worked for the union's newsletter and as a speechwriter for
union leaders for the past 13 years. Callaghan said he personally told
Mulgrew on June 9 about his intention to try to organize nonunionized workers at
UFT headquarters, thinking that Mulgrew would be enthusiastic. Callaghan
told union boss Mulgrew that he wanted to have the same rights that teachers
have. Mulgrew told Callaghan he didn't want that and that he wanted the power
to be able to fire whoever he wanted to.
“This is the exact antithesis of what they preach, and Michael Mulgrew is
the biggest hypocrite out there,” Callaghan fumed in an article recently
posted by the New York Post.
Callaghan said he's planning to file a complaint with the National Labor
Relations Board against the UFT for illegally blocking his unionizing effort,
and he added he would slap the union with an age-discrimination lawsuit.
Callaghan said that yesterday morning, he was hauled into a meeting with
UFT officials, including CFO David Hickey, and told only that he was being
fired from his job and had a half-hour to clear out of the office.
“They gave me no reason, no letter, no cause at all,” said Callaghan, who
insisted that he has received no reprimands or notices about problems with
his work. Callaghan said the union-busting bullying continued after he was
told he was fired, when UFT leaders called in a detail of six uniformed cops
to remove him from his office because he wasn't leaving fast enough.
Much as I'd rather not accept it, while unions have done a lot of good and
have helped workers avoid exploitation, they also seem to have helped
workers exploit employers. Perhaps it has been a gradual shift over time, with
unions slowly accumulating more and more power.
As harsh as it sounds, union members are suckers who get to pay their union
dues in support of candidates they may not like and for whom they wouldn't
vote. You work in a corrupt institution that destroys the very American
dream you're supposed to be working to build. Mr. Union employee, please
understand, your job will still exist without college educated thugs smiling at you
for your money and manipulating you with a proverbial knife behind their
back; or perhaps not even smiling at you before their manipulation of you.
There's no kiss for you before you're screwed.
I am Michele Fiore. I do what I say and I say what I do, popular or not. My
message is short and sweet. Together “we will.”
Michele Fiore is Director of Community and Political Affairs with the Las
Vegas Tribune. She writes a weekly column in this newspaper. To contact
Michele Fiore, email her at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
 

Queens Janison, Edwards: A letter from Jim Rogers

Local News

A reoccurring question at Clark County School Board Meetings is, Why are parents not involved in their child's education? To answer that question, all one has to do is attend those meetings and attempt to participate and speak about the topic of one's choice. Your first mistake will likely be that you did not request to speak prior to the school board meeting that you are attending. Your next mistake will be when you think you can actually address a school board member; you must never forget to bow before Mt. Olympus prior to reaching the public podium. And your last mistake will likely be that you spoke longer than the two-minute allowance given to you by the gods.

Many parents, teachers, taxpayers, and other Clark County residents, leave a Clark County School Board Meeting feeling like they just don't measure up to those they elected to serve them on the school board. Very few people have anything positive to say about their experience speaking in front of the Clark County School Board. Some have likened it to the medieval practice of speaking before the King; they are not that far off seeing as how Trustees Janison and Edwards do feel entitled to their positions and forget they are supposed to answer to the people. We can hardly blame them because we reelect them over and over; and then when they are prevented from running again due to term limits, we award them a throne in a new position like city council or county commission. Folks, Nevada is last in education because of these people, not because there is not enough money given to the district.

The Las Vegas Tribune recently obtained a letter sent to Trustee Carolyn Edwards from Chancellor of the Nevada System of Higher Education Jim Rogers, in which he expresses his disgust with the school board, specifically Trustees Janison and Edwards. Mr. Rogers states in his letter to Trustee Edwards dated August 23, 2010, “I believe your recent conduct in carrying out your duties as a member of the Clark County School Board of Trustees is so egregious that the conduct requires more than a verbal comment from me.” Rogers is referring to a school board meeting on April 22, 2010, in which Trustee Edwards repeatedly refers to “Our (meaning the Trustees) School Board Meeting and not yours.” Last time I checked those trustees represented us and it was our, the citizens, meeting; not theirs.

Read more: Queens Janison, Edwards: A letter from Jim Rogers

   

“Construction Gate” Problem At The Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority Fans Out In All Directions

Local News

Writers at the Tribune are old enough to remember stories like that of Richard Nixon and Watergate. Some stories begin as a single item that merits reporting and then branches out in all directions and into dozens of stories. In light of the phone ringing off the hook with Housing Authority residents, contractors, subcontractors and everybody and his mother, son and daughter calling us to complain, we have decided to follow the article of last week with this followup and more in the future. We also got plenty of calls from Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority (SNRHA); current and former residents and employees alleging just about anything that you can imagine. Most of it was unprovable and without evidence. We told most of the callers that we need physical evidence or multiple witnesses to report something. You have our address. Here is some idea of what credible evidence supports.

 Last week we reported some very out of the ordinary activities at an SNRHA public board meeting associated with the award of a $400,000 construction contract to Yvonne Atkinson Gates' construction company. Gates is a former Clark County Commissioner and school board member who left her County Commission seat in mid-year after multiple Nevada Ethics Commission reprimands and complaints of top casino executive Sheldon Adleson that she used her office to advocate for a business that she wanted to put in casinos. At the board meeting local construction company owner Charles Partington alleged that SHRHA staff violated multiple state laws in the bidding procedures. We were able to reach top level SNRHA staff member Amparo Gamazo to ask for public records and got the runaround. Fortunately, someone came through with the documents and we are publishing three letters here today. The first is a bid protest from Partington. The second was SNRHA Executive director Carl Rowe's reply, and the third a letter back from Partington. Combined, the letters lead to the conclusion of SNRHA staff bid-rigging the contract. The second conclusion is that these letters were addressed to the board and not Rowe, who wrote the reply. Did Rowe and SNRHA staff hide the mail from the board, to whom it was addressed? Did the board know?

In the last article we told you that Commissioner Richard Sadler attempted to resort to personal attacks on Mojave but was mostly cut off by leadership procedures by board president Dora LaGrande. This week we learned that on the morning of that board meeting Sadler arrived at Partington's job sites for the first time ever. He brought a camera with him and accused workers at the job sites of working for a bad contractor and having the messiest job site. At that board meeting, Father Dave Casaleggio and other board members praised Partington's company's work. We still have no idea why Partington said “No” and almost literally ran out of the room when Father Dave asked him if he had filed a complaint. If you can't figure out why, then read this paragraph again.

Read more: “Construction Gate” Problem At The Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority Fans Out In All Directions

   

Another Inquest Is Whitewashed

Local News

User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 

As predicted by the Las Vegas Tribune and as the people of Las Vegas expected, the coroner's inquest into the murder of 21-year-old Trevon Cole - at the hands of Las Vegas police officer Bryan Yant - was declared justifiable by a jury that is obviously controlled by the District Attorney's Office and the Las Vegas Police Department.

Last Friday's inquest was nothing but a dress rehearsal for the family of Eric Scott, in case they expect anything different from the inquest into the murder of their family member. Scott was killed by three Las Vegas police officers during a confrontation outside a Summerlin Costco store.

The unusual chain of events in last Friday's inquest seemed like a paid commercial on behalf of District Attorney David Roger, who - considering that he is in the middle of a campaign re-election - had two of his deputies pretend to do the right thing by publicly questioning the veracity of the testimony by two of the officers present during the killing of Trevon Cole.

Read more: Another Inquest Is Whitewashed

   

CCSD Trustee Edwards Wants To Give Away More Taxpayer Dollars

Local News

User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 

The search has begun to replace Clark County School District Superintendent Walt Rulffes, and it doesn't look to be cheap. It appears that certain members of the school board don't mind that one bit. Trustee Edwards, who is struggling to keep her seat, believes that now is the time to give a large pay increase to the incoming superintendent. Many city and county agencies are facing record deficits and are being forced to lay off much needed help in this economic downturn, and while other agencies are handing out record pay cuts, Trustee Edwards feels that an annual salary of $270,000 is just not enough for the incoming superintendent. Edwards believes that the current salary is not enough to attract top-tier candidates, thereby preventing the district from hiring the best most qualified individual. There are many candidates for the position that have higher salaries than Rulffes, but that does not make them any more qualified for the position than those who make less.

The School District Trustees are elected to be good stewards of taxpayer dollars and spend money wisely, not spend more than the taxpayers can afford. If there is an extra $70,000 lying around in the district budget, then the trustees owe it to our children to put that money back in the schools and school programs, not increase the salaries of an already top-heavy school administration. There is already a public outcry over the salaries of police officers and firefighters, and they barely make a third of what the current superintendent makes; at least they are successful in their jobs, unlike Rulffes.

Some critics, such as Edwards, believe that $270,000 brings us poorer candidates; they may be onto something if we use Walt Rulffes as our example. The point here is that our incompetent school board can't even put together a simple job announcement that includes a salary and we are to trust them when it comes to hiring our next school superintendent? Now they want to move forward with a bungled selection process sticking it to the taxpayers once again. The November election is vital to saving Clark County homeowners hundreds of wasted dollars. We must vote against any incumbent trying to return to the school board and save the little progress we have made. Don't forget, we are 49th in the nation as a school district and quickly on the path to being number 50.

   

Page 1 of 26

MISSION STATEMENT

We search for the truth, embrace the truth, and print the truth. If we inadvertently print something that is not true, we will let our readers know. We are open to documented information to shed light on any issue of concern to our readers. We are of service to our community, and it is our intention to serve our community the best way we can.

Cast Your Vote!

If the election was held today who would you choose for US Senator?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISING

Login Form