Robert Walker

Freedom of Speech?   What Freedom of Speech?
Nancy Pelosi can threaten those of us who don't want a Mosque built on or 
near the site of the destruction caused, reportedly, by Muslims, on September 
11, 2001; and our fearless golfer can promote a religion that, according to 
its bible - the Koran - is bent on killing any non-Muslims; and they are 
each hailed as a great “something,” but no one is sure what that something 
might be.
Pelosi is great at spending taxpayers' dollars on transportation, what with 
her new jet and all.   The fearless golfer is great at the same thing.   He 
managed to take an entourage of 500 with him to Eng-land, and among them 
were six doctors.   Should we have some concerns about the health of our 
fearless golfer?   I would venture to guess that there is one doctor for every 
500 troops in Afghanistan, and they are getting shot at!   But our fearless 
golfer is impo'tant.
If we decide to take the power to exercise one of our natural rights and 
speak out against something that we don't like, we are threatened with an 
investigation - paid for with our own tax dollars!   Isn't that exciting!?
We have the unholy trinity of Reid, Pelosi, and our fearless golfer, to 
make sure that we don't say anything politically incorrect.   Their backup is 
the very politically correct Bill Maher.   The man who wrote that the members 
of our Congress (both the Senate and the House of Representatives) should 
ignore the wishes of the people because the “constituents are stupid.”   
Bill Maher, who is among the constituents, is the stupidest of all because the 
brethren of our fearless golfer are bent on destroying all members of his 
religion - first.   Mr. Maher has the unalienable right to speak his mind and 
insult his audience and make a fool of himself.   I will be the first to 
defend his right to do so.
We, the people, have the right to whatever we wish, as long as we harm no 
one in getting what we wish.   That is contrary to the teachings of the 
experimental psychologists who have taken over the educational system in our once 
great Nation.   The psychologists teach our children that situational 
ethics is the order of the day.   If it feels good, do it.   There are no 
consequences to our actions, according to the Experimental Psychologists.   I am 
thoroughly convinced that that viewpoint is the root cause behind the criminal 
activity of many of our elected officials.   A reckoning is coming, and 
there will be hell to pay, in a manner of speaking, by those who have deceived 
us.   Deception is promoted by the unholy Koran, by the way.
There are many deceivers amongst us.   The State worker who does not do the 
job fully for which he is paid, is a deceiver.   When we see several trucks 
along the side of the road with 8 or 10 men standing around doing nothing, 
we are looking at a group of deceivers.   When our children come home from 
the public indoctrination center after a hard day of learning how to blame 
someone else for their condition, we see the result of a group of highly paid 
deceivers.   They're called teachers.   To be sure, many of the teachers 
have a desire to see students learn, but the deceivers in the government make 
the situation in the schools so difficult that the teachers cannot teach, or 
are not allowed to teach.   The power of these teachers to exercise their 
right to do their jobs is interfered with by the teachers' unions, the 
government(s) and the foolishness of the Experimental Psychologists.
The loving parents who want their children educated are being deceived by 
the government and others.   The student who desires to be a teacher is 
deceived by the system that will teach him or her to teach.   The enthusiasm of a 
young graduate that is going into the teaching profession is soon turned 
into helplessness, hopelessness, and apathy by the system that stops them from 
teaching the truth.
Our young students are taught that they have the freedom of speech, as long 
as the speech is politically acceptable.   If one were to say, “I love dead 
terrorists,” would that be considered hate speech?   If I say that I love 
something, that is not hate speech, in my opinion, but could it be construed 
as such?
Freedom of speech is considered by some as being able to use foul language 
in public utterances, such as a radio or television broadcast.   To be sure, 
it is such.   But is it smart to make obvious that one has a limited 
vocabulary? Freedom of speech is a touchy thing in this day and age.   Just as it 
was in the time leading up to the American Revolution of the late 18th 
century. We must rely on the Ultimate Power when we use our own power to exercise 
our natural and inherent right to freedom of speech, or of the press, or of 
religion, unless we want to preach the good of murder and mayhem of certain 
hate-filled and deceitful members of the Islam religion.
Robert Walker is the News Director of the Las Vegas Tribune and host of the 
Internet radio show “Know Your Rights.” Email Robert Walker at 

  This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 .